Skip to main content
· 12/21/1906

Catlett v. Stokes

Citations

  • 21 S.D. 108
  • 110 N.W. 84
  • 1906 S.D. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The apparent object of the law [requiring recordation] was to secure creditors and subsequent purchasers, and not to affect the parties.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.