Skip to main content
· 8/22/2013

Cathy Jackson-Platts v. General Electric Capital Corporation

Citations

  • 727 F.3d 1127
  • 2013 WL 4463006
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that this factor is neutral when both the state and federal fora would be adequate
  • finding that a federal action was “further along” than a parallel state action where discovery had commenced in the federal action
  • noting that a district court had diversity jurisdiction over claims asserted in Fla. Stat. § 56.29 supplementary proceedings
  • noting that this factor does not counsel in favor of dismissal when state court action is no further along than the federal case
  • finding that this factor did not favor abstention when the case did not present “particularly complex” state law questions
  • finding that this factor weighs in favor of abstention where the applicable state law is \particularly complex or best left for state courts to resolve\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Pryor, Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.