Catholic Health Initiatives Iowa Corp. v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an adjudication must have retroactive effect, or else it would be considered a rulemaking”
• noting that the adjustment “is based on Congress’s judgment that low-income patients are often in poorer health, and therefore costlier for hospitals to treat.”
• explaining that the SSI fraction focuses on Medicare beneficiaries who “received” SSI payments
• upholding the Secretary’s interpretation of the phrase to include days for which Medicare coverage was exhausted
• The “language is downright byzantine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).