Cathleen Raney v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that one consulting physician’s RFC assessment supported the ALJ’s RFC finding when none of the claimant’s treating physicians opined she was unable to work
• rejecting the argument that ALJ failed to consider impairments in combination where he specifically stated he h a d
• rejecting the argument that ALJ failed to consider impairments in combination where he specifically stated he h a d
• noting absence of “medical records or opinions documenting Raney’s use of a cane as being medically necessary”
• finding ALJ’s RFC determination was supported by substantial evidence based on, among other things, “no medical records or opinions documenting Raney's use of a cane as being medically necessary”
• evaluating therapist's assessment as \other medical evidence\ rather than as a treating source opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).