Cathey Quantock v. Shared Marketing Services, Inc., and Rick Lattanzio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment on plaintiff’s “quid pro quo” sexual harassment claim where there was no evidence that plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action
• finding common law tort claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the same allegations as a Title VII sexual harassment claim was preempted by the Human Rights Act
• finding common law tort claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the same allegations as a Title VII sexual harassment claim was preempted by the Human Rights Act
• “The Illinois Human Rights Act preempts tort claims that are ‘inextricably linked’ to allegations of sexual harassment and requires that such claims be brought only before the Illinois Human Rights Commission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).