Catherine Taylor v. Tenant Tracker, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this is an open question
• recognizing that this is an open question
• finding that a plaintiffs own testimony that she was upset and embarrassed, even when coupled with a third party’s testimony that the plaintiff cried, did “not establish the sort of concrete emotional distress that is required to constitute a genuine injury and actual damages”
• agreeing “with other circuits that a consumer must present competent evidence of actual injury to state a claim under the FCRA” and affirming grant of summary judgment as to a FCRA negligent-noncompliance claim
• agreeing “with other circuits that a consumer must present competent evidence of actual injury to state a claim under the FCRA” and affirming grant of summary judgment as to a FCRA negligent- noncompliance claim
• “We do not agree with the district court that the ‘technical accuracy’ standard . . . states the law of this circuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).