Catherine SZUBAK, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirement prevents claimants from having more than one bite at the apple
• holding that the requirement prevents claimants from having more than one bite at the apple
• stating that “new evidence” cannot be “merely cumulative of what is already in the record”
• finding that medical reports providing greater depth to appellant's personal history in relation to her alleged psychiatric problems were not cumulative of evidence already in the record
• noting that an implicit materiality requirement is that the new evidence “not concern evidence of a later acquired disability or of the subsequent deterioration of the previously non-disabling condition”
• explaining that “§ 405(g) now requires that to support a ‘new evidence’ remand the evidence must first be ‘new’ and not merely cumulative of what is already in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).