Skip to main content
· 1/8/2004

Catherine Prichard Kaplan, Independent of the Estate of John F. Prichard v. Charles I. Kaplan

Citations

  • 129 S.W.3d 666
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the trial court = s conclusions of law are reviewable de novo as questions of law
  • stating that the trial court’s conclusions of law are reviewable de novo as questions of law
  • listing elements of judicial admission, including statement must be contrary to essential fact asserted by party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Holman, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.