· 1/8/2004
Catherine Prichard Kaplan, Independent of the Estate of John F. Prichard v. Charles I. Kaplan
Citations
- 129 S.W.3d 666
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the trial court = s conclusions of law are reviewable de novo as questions of law
- stating that the trial court’s conclusions of law are reviewable de novo as questions of law
- listing elements of judicial admission, including statement must be contrary to essential fact asserted by party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dauphinot, Holman, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.