Skip to main content
· 4/5/1994

Catherine L. Turner Fulk, Administrator of the Estate of Larry D. Turner, Deceased, and Catherine Turner Fulk v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 120
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6491
  • 1994 WL 111524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appeal is not moot where the litigant “retains some 3 1 interest in the case, so that a decision in [her] favor will inure to [her] benefit” (internal quotation 2 marks omitted)
  • \the question of whether a duty exists in the first place remains with the court\
  • in a FELA case, whether the defendant has a duty to protect the plaintiff is a question of law and is not for the jury to decide
  • “determination of any question of duty—that is, whether the law imposed upon the 14 No. 18-3507 defendant the obligation to protect the plaintiff against the consequences which occurred—is a question of law, and is not for the jury.”
  • “determination of any question of duty—that is, whether the law imposed upon the 14 No. 18-3507 defendant the obligation to protect the plaintiff against the consequences which occurred—is a question of law, and is not for the jury.”
  • breach of duty is a question for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Roszkowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.