· 4/5/1994
Catherine L. Turner Fulk, Administrator of the Estate of Larry D. Turner, Deceased, and Catherine Turner Fulk v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
Citations
- 22 F.3d 120
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6491
- 1994 WL 111524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an appeal is not moot where the litigant “retains some 3 1 interest in the case, so that a decision in [her] favor will inure to [her] benefit” (internal quotation 2 marks omitted)
- \the question of whether a duty exists in the first place remains with the court\
- in a FELA case, whether the defendant has a duty to protect the plaintiff is a question of law and is not for the jury to decide
- “determination of any question of duty—that is, whether the law imposed upon the 14 No. 18-3507 defendant the obligation to protect the plaintiff against the consequences which occurred—is a question of law, and is not for the jury.”
- “determination of any question of duty—that is, whether the law imposed upon the 14 No. 18-3507 defendant the obligation to protect the plaintiff against the consequences which occurred—is a question of law, and is not for the jury.”
- breach of duty is a question for the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Roszkowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.