Skip to main content
· 11/30/1984

Catherine Flynn and Ryan Flynn, a Minor, by His Mother Catherine Flynn v. George Shultz, Secretary of State of the United States of America, Defendant

Citations

  • 748 F.2d 1186
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Hostage Act contained no “standards upon which judicial review could be undertaken” where the terms of the statute and the legislative history provide no indication as to the meaning of the phrase “unjustly deprived”
  • “Obviously, the Mexican government is not bound by the requirements of our Constitution.”
  • “Obviously, the Mexican government is not bound by the requirements of our Constitution.”
  • “Not only would it be inappropriate for us to scrutinize the defendant under such a vague and subjective standard, but the vagueness of the term itself indicates to us that ... Congress seems to have contemplated that the President would make a subjective judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Pos-Ner, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.