Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/24/1992
Cathcart v. Cathcart
Citations
- 414 S.E.2d 811
- 307 S.C. 322
- 1992 S.C. App. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no common law marriage where the evidence showed that the parties did not refer to each other as husband and wife and did not file joint tax returns
- where the family court expressly linked the attorney fee award to the beneficial results obtained by the parties in the litigation, the amount of the award merited reexamination by the family court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Littlejohn, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moseley v. MosierSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-08-30· cited 98×
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1983-11-07· cited 65×
- United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-02-07· cited 45×
- Croom v. CroomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-06-10· cited 14×
Other cases named Cathcart v. Cathcart
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.