· 4/15/1993
Cathay Bank v. Lee
Citations
- 14 Cal. App. 4th 1533
- 18 Cal. Rptr. 2d 420
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2868
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 4871
- 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “the usual rule [is] that ambiguities are construed against the drafter”
- “The language in Indusco seems very general indeed, so we can easily understand why it failed to pass muster.”
- “The language in Indusco seems very general indeed, so we can easily understand why it failed to pass muster.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.