Skip to main content

Cates v. State

Citations

  • 320 A.2d 75
  • 21 Md. App. 363
  • 77 A.L.R. 3d 1353
  • 1974 Md. App. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that rulings from other jurisdictions are persuasive authority, and “[i]f the reasoning which supports them fails to persuade, they are no authority at all”
  • noting that predecessor to Loss Recovery Statute encompassed a public policy “not to help one who loses at gambling; but to discourage illegal gambling by putting the winner on notice that the courts will ... force him to disgorge his winnings”
  • “It is an ancient rule of law that parties to an illegal transaction can obtain no relief in the courts.”
  • felony-murder conviction based on forcible retaking of gambling losses as robbery sustained
  • felony-murder conviction based on forcible retaking of gambling losses as robbery sustained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Gilbert, Lowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.