Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/22/1974
Cates v. State
Citations
- 320 A.2d 75
- 21 Md. App. 363
- 77 A.L.R. 3d 1353
- 1974 Md. App. LEXIS 413
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that rulings from other jurisdictions are persuasive authority, and “[i]f the reasoning which supports them fails to persuade, they are no authority at all”
- noting that predecessor to Loss Recovery Statute encompassed a public policy “not to help one who loses at gambling; but to discourage illegal gambling by putting the winner on notice that the courts will ... force him to disgorge his winnings”
- “It is an ancient rule of law that parties to an illegal transaction can obtain no relief in the courts.”
- felony-murder conviction based on forcible retaking of gambling losses as robbery sustained
- felony-murder conviction based on forcible retaking of gambling losses as robbery sustained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Powers, Gilbert, Lowe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-05-04· cited 546×
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-05-04· cited 212×
- People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-11-15· cited 201×
- McCord v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-09-09· cited 82×
- State v. MorantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 60×
- Croft v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. DombrauskasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 38×
- Couplin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-18· cited 25×
- Jacobs v. AdamsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-13· cited 23×
- Jupiter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-11· cited 22×
- Mia Mason v. Machine Zone, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2017-03-17· cited 22×
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-11-04· cited 20×
- People v. HodgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-12-30· cited 19×
- Munday v. Waste Management of North America, Inc.D. Maryland· 1998-03-16· cited 15×
- State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-02-06· cited 15×
- Selective Way v. NationwideCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-10-30· cited 14×
- Coates v. State of MarylandD. Maryland· 1977-08-01· cited 12×
- In Re SmithD. Maryland· 1986-10-16· cited 10×
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-02-16· cited 7×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-03· cited 6×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 150×
- Butts v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1926-06-17· cited 117×
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 101×
- State v. GoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-09· cited 67×
- People v. RosenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1938-04-19· cited 48×
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-03-27· cited 47×
- Darby v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-03-20· cited 41×
- Putinski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-06-13· cited 29×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1891-04-15· cited 29×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-11-13· cited 26×
- People v. GallegosSupreme Court of Colorado· 1954-09-27· cited 25×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-09-19· cited 23×
- Phenious v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-11· cited 19×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-09-25· cited 18×
- State v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court· 1923-11-03· cited 17×
- People v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court· 1918-07-18· cited 17×
- Gant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1902-03-26· cited 11×
- Gover v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-04-19· cited 6×
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-05-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.