· 4/1/1991
Cates v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 928 F.2d 679
- 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 784
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the holding in Erie R.R. v. Tomkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)
- “Rebuttal must be kept in perspective; it is not to 17 be used as a continuation of the case-in-chief.”
- \The standard for reviewing an attorney's fees award is abuse of discretion.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.