· 3/30/2005
Caterpillar, Inc. v. Usinor Industeel
Citations
- 393 F. Supp. 2d 659
- 56 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 931
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6355
- 2005 WL 736550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the CISG is self-executing and applies unless the contracting parties expressly opt out of coverage
- “The law in force is the law as it was before the adoption of the unconstitutional Amendment.”
- “A promise for purposes of promissory estoppel typically involves ‘a declaration that one will do or refrain from doing something specified.’” (quoting Derby Meadows Utility Co. v. Inter–Continental Real Estate, 202 Ill. App. 3d 345, 361 (1990))
- implying proximate cause element for implied warranty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pallmeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.