Skip to main content
· 8/21/1997

Caterpillar Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, United Auto Workers, Local 974, Intervening-Respondent

Citations

  • 122 F.3d 437
  • 1997 CCH OSHD 31,396
  • 17 OSHC (BNA) 2121
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a general duty clause violation requires “(i) the existence of a hazard likely to cause death or serious physical harm; (ii) the employer’s recognition (i.e., awareness) of the hazard; (iii) the availability of feasible means to abate the hazard; and (iv

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.