Skip to main content
· 4/29/1994

Caterair International v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 1114
  • 306 U.S. App. D.C. 32
  • 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2209
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the cease and desist order is a “sound third option” to an election and bargaining order because it mandates a return to the status quo
  • noting, in an incumbent union case, that a cease and desist order is a “prime example” of an alternative remedy to those affirmative bargaining orders outlined in Gissel
  • “[T]he Supreme Court has treated medical care claims 23 substantially the same as other conditions of confinement violations including failure-to- 24 protect claims.”
  • “A party alleging fraud must ‘set forth more than the neutral 23 facts necessary to identify the transaction.’” (citation omitted)
  • “[S]ection 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis 23 1 complaints, not just those filed by prisoners.”
  • “De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and 23 recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the 24 findings and recommendations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Edwards, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.