Skip to main content
· 2/24/1964

Cater v. Pennsylvania

Citations

  • 376 U.S. 933
  • 84 S. Ct. 704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “overriding purpose” of § 16(b) is to make it “unprofitable for insiders to engage in short-swing speculation.”
  • conversion of preferred stock into common stock found not to constitute a sale of the preferred stock
  • “[W]hen proof establishes a factual situation which would just as well justify defendants’ conduct as to lead to an inference of conspiracy, then plaintiff has failed to carry her burden.”
  • appellants as private persons were incapable of violating the substantive statute requiring action under “color of law,” but they could be found guilty of aiding and abetting a violation of that statute by an individual acting under “color of law”
  • teacher may not be terminated without due process
  • Id. teacher whose contract was not renewed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.