· 2/24/1964
Cater v. Pennsylvania
Citations
- 376 U.S. 933
- 84 S. Ct. 704
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “overriding purpose” of § 16(b) is to make it “unprofitable for insiders to engage in short-swing speculation.”
- conversion of preferred stock into common stock found not to constitute a sale of the preferred stock
- “[W]hen proof establishes a factual situation which would just as well justify defendants’ conduct as to lead to an inference of conspiracy, then plaintiff has failed to carry her burden.”
- appellants as private persons were incapable of violating the substantive statute requiring action under “color of law,” but they could be found guilty of aiding and abetting a violation of that statute by an individual acting under “color of law”
- teacher may not be terminated without due process
- Id. teacher whose contract was not renewed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.