Skip to main content
· 4/30/1940

Cater Const. Co. v. Nischwitz

Citations

  • 111 F.2d 971
  • 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “even a single extra day of incarceration is of substantial significance for constitutional purposes”
  • recognizing that \even a single extra day of incarceration is of substantial significance for constitutional purposes\
  • in the context of habeas corpus petitions, observing that “even a single extra day of incarceration is of substantial significance for constitutional purposes”
  • “Bearden controls the analysis of whether 18 and under what circumstances an individual can be subjected to greater incarceration 19 solely because of indigency.”
  • in turn, citing O'Brien v. Dubois, 145 F.3d 16, 25 (1st Cir. 1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Major

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.