Skip to main content
· 12/9/1974

Catena v. United States

Citations

  • 419 U.S. 1047
  • 95 S. Ct. 621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using these criteria to determine the availability of the writ of mandamus to remedy a discovery order
  • issuing writ vacating discovery order that required party to produce documents subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege prior to a ruling on the merits of the objection
  • holding interlocutory discovery orders are generally not appealable
  • explaining the prerequisites for mandamus review of a discovery order
  • same result in case concerning asbestos installation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.