Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/28/1989
Catania v. Hanover Insurance
Citations
- 566 A.2d 885
- 389 Pa. Super. 144
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3499
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While we recognize that the Dragonetti Act does permit recovery for damage to reputation and emotional distress, this fact alone does not transform this tort, the purpose of which is to discourage baseless civil suits, into an action protecting against false statements”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beck, Johnson, Melinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-30· cited 41×
- Regent Insurance v. Strausser Enterprises, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-09-28· cited 5×
- Werner v. Platzer-ZyberkPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-02-20
- Hakim v. Erie Insurance ExchangeMonroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-03-18
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.