Catalina Foothills Ass'n, Inc. v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contrary rule would \misdirect the benefit derived through the foresight of the cautious individual who procured insurance\ and \would also discriminate against the insurance company\
• \Evidence that could have been discovered with reasonable diligence prior to trial is not entitled to be considered as 'newly discovered.'\ (quoting Ariz. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(2)1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).