Catalano v. Falco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding admission of expert testimony when disclosure had stated that expert was expected to testify “in accordance with his treatment notes and evaluation and consultation reports”
• review of denial of motion for continuance limited to abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Calderon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-04-06· cited 24×
• Wexler v. DeMaio
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-10-03· cited 13×
• Doe v. Carreiro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-04-04· cited 9×
• Milardo v. Kowaleski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-19· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Department of Social Services v. Saunders
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-16· cited 48×
• Marchetti v. Ramirez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-02-18· cited 38×
• Ormsby v. Frankel
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-04-17· cited 34×
• Cadle Co. v. Errato
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-06· cited 32×
• Ormsby v. Frankel
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-07-06· cited 21×
• Sullivan v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-07· cited 21×
• Samose v. Hammer-Passero Norwalk Chiropractic Group, P.C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-02-12· cited 20×
• Samose v. Hammer-Passero Norwalk Chiropractic Group, P.C.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-27· cited 14×
• State v. Tinsley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-25· cited 12×
• State v. Tinsley
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-10-25· cited 12×
• Mojica v. Benjamin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-17· cited 9×