Caswell v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s “structure violates the separation of powers” because the Agency was led by a single Director removable by the Pres- ident only “ ‘for cause’ ”
• concluding that the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s “structure violates the separation of powers” because the Agency was led by a single Director removable by the Pres- ident only “ ‘for cause’ ”
• recognizing that Seila Law did “not revisit [] prior decisions”
• noting that the Court “did ‘not revisit [its] prior decisions allowing certain limitations on the President’s removal power’” in Seila Law (quoting Seila Law, 591 U.S. at 204)
• striking down the independence of an agency headed by a single person, regardless of whether the executive power it wielded was significant, but recognizing that Seila Law did “not revisit our prior decisions” (cleaned up)
• reviewing separation-of-powers claim challenging statute's \for-cause restriction on the President's removal authority\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).