Skip to main content

Castro v. State

Citations

  • 580 N.E.2d 232
  • 1991 Ind. LEXIS 200
  • 1991 WL 215061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating whether defendant was prejudiced by denial of motion for separate trial and stating defendant had not pointed to any specific testimony or evidence that could not have been admitted had defendant been tried separately
  • evaluating whether defendant was prejudiced by denial of motion for separate trial and stating defendant had not pointed to any specific testimony or evidence that could not have been admitted had defendant been tried separately
  • “When appellant seeks a reversal claiming an abuse of discretion in the denial of his motion for separate trial, he must show actual prejudice.”
  • “When appellant seeks a reversal claiming an abuse of discretion in the denial of his motion for separate trial, he must show actual prejudice.”
  • because death is likely result of prolonged, severe beating, no issue of incidental death present which would support instruction on involuntary manslaughter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Givan, Shepard, Debruler, Dickson, Krahulik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.