Castro v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying defendant’s Rule 11 motion on procedural grounds because, inter alia, defendant failed to wait 21 days until after service of the motion on plaintiff before filing it
• “A motion that fails to comply with the safe harbor provision of Rule 11 must be denied.”
• “Courts have held that even a letter detailing the nature of the conduct which purportedly violates Rule 11 and threatening to file a motion for sanctions cannot constitute notice under Rule 11.”
• “Courts have held that even a letter detailing the nature of the conduct which purportedly violates Rule 11 and threatening to file a motion for sanctions cannot constitute notice under Rule 11.” (citing cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).