Castro v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to identify any misrepresentations by defendants regarding the “existence or effect” of an arbitration clause within an agreement because plaintiff read the clause, “voiced no opposition,” and signed the agreement
• explaining that “plaintiff must demonstrate that whatever fraud occurred misled plaintiff as to the arbitration agreement itself”
• explaining that “plaintiff must demonstrate that whatever fraud occurred misled plaintiff as to the arbitration agreement itself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).