Castro v. Earl Scheib of Oregon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ORS 20.080 demand was adequate on the grounds that it was “reasonably calculated to apprise [the] defendant of the demand”
• holding that an ORS 20.080 demand was adequate on the grounds that is was ‘reasonably calculated to apprise [the] defendant of the demand’
• finding that notice to the particular place of business where the injury occurred was reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant of the demand where the record indicated that the notice went to “the people responsible for [the] injury” and “most familiar with [the] plaintiffs claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).