Skip to main content
· 11/9/1920

Castrillón & Cía., S. en C. v. Campillo

Citations

  • 28 P.R. Dec. 1017
  • 1920 PR Sup. LEXIS 392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A contention that “the accused obtained payment of a liquidated debt by false pretenses” does not raise a mistake of fact.
  • the defense of inability to return was raised by the government witness’s recounting of the accused’s excuse for missing work
  • “An instruction on obtaining money in payment of a debt by false pretenses would have been inconsistent with the defense’s theory and under those circumstances, no instruction was required.” Emphasis added.
  • accused’s testimony raised the issue of physical inability to return

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.