Castricone v. Michaud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking into account the entire cost incurred in completing and repairing the house in the damages calculation
• “under the general rule the total cost of completing the home must be netted against the original contract price.”
• where the contractor provided poor workmanship and the plaintiffs spent additional money to finish the project and repair/replace defective construction, the measure of damages was the amount in excess of the contract price that was incurred to complete the home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Meyers v. Woods
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-14· cited 28×
• Unified Contractor, Inc. v. Albuquerque Housing Auth.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-04-24· cited 25×
• Heller International Corp. v. Sharp
  N.D. Illinois· 1993-12-16· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Park v. Sohn
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-03-16· cited 74×
• Brewer v. Custom Builders Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-10-04· cited 59×
• W. E. Erickson Construction, Inc. v. Congress-Kenilworth Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 40×
• Ross v. Danter Associates, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1968-11-22· cited 34×
• Wells v. Minor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-12· cited 30×
• Kalal v. Goldblatt Brothers, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-09-28· cited 23×
• Mayfield v. Swafford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-14· cited 20×
• Witty v. C. Casey Homes, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-15· cited 15×