· 5/21/1900
Castner v. Coffman
Citations
- 178 U.S. 168
- 20 S. Ct. 842
- 44 L. Ed. 1021
- 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1665
Syllabus
<p>On the facts as detailed, in the opinion of the court, it is held that there was no error in the decree of the court below.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that coal from the Pocahontas Number 3 seam has been “well and favorably known as a coal of high grade”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, After Making the Foregoing Statement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.