Castlepoint Insurance v. Jaipersaud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “home was a three-family dwelling, rather than a two-family dwelling as covered by the subject policy” because each of the three units “had separate entrances”
• holding that coverage is determined by “structural configuration” of premises and not certificate of occupancy because “the number of families is determined by actual use, even if in violation of the certificate of occupancy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).