Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 7/18/1984
Castleberry v. State
Citations
- 704 S.W.2d 21
- 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 724
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court has no duty to admonish defendant of the consequences of defendant’s rejection of the plea agreement
- “We conclude the rationale of Pearce does not and cannot apply to the instant case simply because appellant never exercised his statutory or constitutional right to review by a higher court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Davis, Odom, Onion, Teague, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-11-17· cited 217×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-24· cited 98×
- Ex Parte McAfeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-08· cited 62×
- Sawyer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-08-31· cited 33×
- Woodson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-08-31· cited 17×
- Watson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1988-11-02· cited 13×
- Amaya v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1988-10-05· cited 9×
- Booker Thomas Bonner, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-28
- John Crittenden v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1993-04-14
- Barry Coleman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-04-06
- Stanley Alexander v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-10-15
- Neal, Ronnie JoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-11-17
- Gary Lavelle Richardson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-02-12
- Noe Losoya v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-02-12
- Eugenio Espinoza Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2012-08-31
- Luis Reza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-04-07
- Benjamin Franklin Pieper, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-06-06
- Michael Manuel Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-12-17
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-01· cited 683×
- Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-04-02· cited 442×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-12· cited 236×
- Jimmy Frank v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1980-11-17· cited 143×
- DeVary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-13· cited 93×
- Wooldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-20· cited 50×
- Lechuga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-11· cited 44×
- James Edward Ehl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1981-09-14· cited 29×
- Ex Parte BowmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-04· cited 27×
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United States ex rel. Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 21×
- Palm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-07· cited 19×
- Freddie Martin v. Frank C. Blackburn, Warden, and William Guste, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1979-11-07· cited 15×
- Payton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-03-20· cited 14×
- Charles B. Chapman v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentFifth Circuit· 1979-06-05· cited 10×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-09-17· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.