Castillo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that the defendant has appointed counsel at trial is not dispositive on the issue of indigency for purposes of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gray v. Robinson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-13· cited 47×
• Ex Parte Harris
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-14· cited 39×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-06· cited 7×
• Wade v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-31· cited 4×
• Abdnor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-18· cited 4×
• Kent Anthony Krueger v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1992-06-10