Castillo v. Matesanz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming substitution of United States as defendant and 16 subsequently dismissing case because plaintiff’s “tort claims are barred by 28 U.S.C. 17 § 2680(h)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).