Skip to main content
· 2/3/1919

Castille v. Cormier

Citations

  • 144 La. 640
  • 81 So. 210
  • 1919 La. LEXIS 1604

Syllabus

<p>(Syllabus by the Court.) '</p> <p>Negligence <&wkey;121(3) — Fire — Proximate Cause — Recovery.</p> <p>While it does not follow, because a fire occurs after an engine has passed, that the one happening is necessarily the consequence of the other, yet, where a fire occurs, the ignition of which is explicable by the proximity of an engine, capable, through negligence, of emitting sparks and cinders, and upon no other theory which finds any support in the facts, it is unnecessary, in order to entitle the owner of the burned property to recover, that he should have followed the sparks or cinders from the engine to the property and watched the process of ignition.</p>

Judges: Monroe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.