Casterline v. Stuerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing that a party potentially may have a protected expectancy or relationship that the law will endeavor to protect even in the absence of an enforceable contract
• reversing grant of summary judgment to defendants where plaintiff, director of nurses who had oral indefinite employment relationship, alleged that concerted accusations of defendants resulted in her discharge
• “the defendants, sued in their private, individual capacities, can take no benefit from [section 432.070]. The purpose of the statute is to protect the county. It was not designed to insulate individuals from liability for their tortious acts.” (internal citations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).