Castelo v. Xceed Financial Credit Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the PLRA “does not provide for a standalone damages remedy against federal jailers[.]” (quoting Ziglar, 582 U.S. at 149)
• recognizing that the PLRA “does not provide for a standalone damages remedy against federal jailers[.]” (quoting Ziglar, 582 U.S. at 149)
• concluding that a federal inmate’s claim for damages under the Fifth Amendment for alleged violations of his right to procedural due process presented a new Bivens context
• stating that the BOP must be given deference concerning prison discipline and inmate employment
• refusing to extend Bivens remedy beyond three very specific contexts permitted by the Supreme Court
• declining to extend Bivens to an inmate’s Fifth Amendment equal protection and due process claims stemming from alleged racial discrimination by the inmate’s supervisor in the BOP’s employment program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).