Castellow v. CHEVRON USA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that proposed expert witness testimony did not “bear the necessary indicia of intellectual rigor” where “the mathematical errors which required multiple amendments to [the expert’s] reports call into question the validity of his opinions” (citation omitted)
• excluding an expert’s exposure assessment partially because he failed to validate his modeling assessment with comparable monitoring data from the scientific literature
• “It is accepted that, in evaluating a purported causal link between a chemical agent and a particular disease, epidemiological studies are the most informative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).