Castellon, Anthony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in the context of a motion to suppress we review a district court’s factual findings for clear error and its application of law de novo
• affirming a sentence even where the district court “appl[ied] the enhancement sua sponte”
• finding adequate notice for a district court’s sua sponte upward variance based on perjured testimony where the government provided notice prior to the sentencing hearing that it might seek an upward variance for the same conduct
• “[N]otice, although neces- sary for a court to issue an upward departure, is not necessary for a court to issue an upward variance.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).