CASTANZA v. Town of Brookhaven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Town did not need warrant to enter property and abate nuisance
• stating that officers, agents, and employees of a single corporate entity are legally incapable of conspiring together
• “Based upon the 4 “Although the Supreme Court’s decision in [Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009
• “[I]t is duplicative to name both a government entity and the entity’s employees in their official capacity.”
• “[I]t is duplicative to name both a government entity and the entity’s employees in their official capacity
• “Official-capacity suits generally represent only another way of pleading an action against an entity of which an officer is an agent.” (brackets omitted; internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).