Skip to main content
· 7/13/1992

Castaneda v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 596 N.E.2d 1281
  • 231 Ill. App. 3d 734
  • 173 Ill. Dec. 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee’s “last day of exposure to repetitive trauma is not, in and of itself, the day of accident for the purposes of repetitive injury cases”
  • holding that an employee=s Alast day of exposure to repetitive trauma is not, in and of itself, the day of accident for the purposes of repetitive injury cases@
  • “It is thus clear that a claimant’s last day of exposure to repetitive trauma is not, in and of itself, the day of accident for the purposes of repetitive injury cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rakowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.