Castaneda v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sheriff's rule requiring bondsmen to fill out an application form was supported by the sheriff's authority under Code of Criminal Procedure, articles 17.11 and 17.14
• holding that a sheriffs rule requiring bondsmen to till out an application form was supported by the sheriffs authority under Code of Criminal Procedure, articles 17.11 and 17.14
• holding that an officer taking bail bonds under chapter 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is prohibited from adopting rules which exceed statutory authority in the same way bail bond boards are limited to adopting rules authorized by and consistent with chapter 1704 of the Occupations Code
• holding that an officer taking bail bonds under chapter 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is prohibited from adopting rules which exceed statutory authority in the same way bail bond boards are limited to adopting rules authorized by and consistent with chapter 1704 of the Occupations Code
• \The rule requiring bondsmen to fill out an application form is permissible under the Sheriff's authority to require evidence of the sufficiency of the security offered by bondsmen.\
• “The rule requiring bondsmen to fill out an application form is permissible under the Sheriffs authority to require evidence of the sufficiency of the security offered by bondsmen.“

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).