Skip to main content
· 3/24/2011

Castaneda-Castillo v. Holder

Citations

  • 638 F.3d 354
  • 2011 WL 1049777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases where courts have retained jurisdiction during remand to the Board
  • “Fuentes does not establish a per se bar to consideration of attacks that occurred while the respondent happened to be on active duty.”
  • “[T]he sheer fact of being on active duty is not dispositive under Fuentes.... ”
  • the “underlying concern in Fuentes was that police officers ... cannot be eligible for asylum simply because they were exposed to assault in the line of duty,” as “[t]hat is, after all, part of their job”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Ripple, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.