Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation

• Article

• Talk

Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 596 U.S. 107 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, in a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act , a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.[1] [2]

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cassirer_v._Thyssen-Bornemisza_Collection_Foundation&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: References")

1. ↑ Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 20-1566 , 596 U.S. ___ (2022).
2. ↑ "Family seeking to recover Nazi-stolen art notches small victory — but still might not get the painting back" . SCOTUSblog. April 21, 2022. Retrieved October 31, 2024.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cassirer_v._Thyssen-Bornemisza_Collection_Foundation&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: External links")

• Text of Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 20-1566, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court . As a work of the U.S. federal government , the text is in the **public domain **.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cassirer_v._Thyssen-Bornemisza_Collection_Foundation&oldid=1363544805 "