· 4/19/1978
Cassidy v. Fuller
Citations
- 568 S.W.2d 845
- 21 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 325
- 1978 Tex. LEXIS 340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the purpose of making venue proper in county in which the child has resided for six months is to prevent forum shopping
- holding that venue provision in the Family Code \clearly\ intended its use of \shall\ to be mandatory
- explaining that it is easier to prove the current circumstances affecting children in their county of residence
- relying on statutory language similar to that currently codified at section 103.001 of the Texas Family Code
- relying on statutory language similar to that currently codified at section 103.001 of the Texas Family Code
- “[V]enue provision was enacted for the reason that current circumstances affecting the child may usually be best shown in the county where the child resides.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steakley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.