Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application of a procedural bar to a pending case does not violate due process since there is no vested right in the outcome of such pending case
• cost of prosecuting litigation based on prior case law does not preclude application of change in decisional law to pending case
• cost of prosecuting litigation based on prior case law does not preclude application of change in decisional law to pending case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).