· 6/10/1940
Cassidy v. Cincinnati
Citations
- 32 Ohio Law. Abs. 444
- 31 N.E.2d 463
- 18 Ohio Op. 464
- 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 1168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- majority and dissent disagreeing about the implications of Evergreen
- majority and dissent disagreeing about the implications of Evergreen
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton, Matthews, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.