Cassidy v. Baltimore County Board of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between “private undertakings” and undertakings “clothed with a public interest,” and concluding that a special exception was warranted under the circumstances, thereby obviating the need to determine whether a privately owned public utility (“BGE”
• specifically discussing the requirements for legally sufficient notice in administrative proceedings, but not addressing constitutional due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).