Casserley v. Pacific Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing threshold for imposing inherent authority sanctions under identical Fifth Circuit standard as “high” and declining to impose sanctions even where 30(b)(6) witness admitted to perjury
• “Objections to discovery must be made with specificity, and the responding party has the obligation to explain and support its objections.”
• “It is Defendants' responsibility to provide meaningful responses to the requests for production, and it is Defendants' responsibility to review the voluminous documents to identify those that are responsive to specific requests.”
• “A party who has objected to a discovery request then must, in response to a Rule 37(a) motion to compel, urge and argue in support of its objection to an interrogatory or request, and, if it does not, it waives the objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).